In Defense of The GPL
The GPL is the most widely used open source license on Earth, yet it has never been tested in a U.S. courtroom.
That’s not to say that alleged GPL license violations aren’t already hitting the country’s judicial system. In fact, the Software Freedom Law Center (SFLC), a pro bono legal firm assisting open source projects, has filed three different actions concerning the GPL this year. Two of those lawsuits came just last week.
The ultimate impact of these actions could well serve to either spurn or spawn even greater open source adoption, industry observers say.
All three suits involve violations with the codebase for BusyBox, a collection of UNIX utilities that have been optimized for size and are most commonly used in embedded environments.
The GPL is a reciprocal license and requires that users make the source code available to end users. In a pair of suits filed Nov. 19 in New York, the SFLC alleged that two companies, Xterasys and High-Gain Antennas, illegally distributed BusyBox without the source code.
In October, the SFLC settled an earlier lawsuit that had made similar claims against Monsoon Multimedia.











